Technological phallic symbols
It’s finals week. That means no classes and a whole hell of a lot of paper writing. Right now I’m on campus, rather than at home, because I subscribe to the myth that there are places where I’m more productive.
So, I’m seated at the tables outside a coffeeshop here, working on a 13″ MacBook I borrowed from an awesome friend. While here, the wonderful girl I’m seeing found me and decided that she might as well write her papers here, too, and pulled out her own laptop, an aging 17″ Dell XPS. The size disparity between these two machines is absolutely absurd. Knowing full well what might or might not have been on my mind, this delightful girl quickly commented on how small my penis must appear to any passersby, as her laptop was so much larger than mine.
I laughed a lot, but I didn’t really think she’d be right.
The tables in this area are becoming more crowded as the morning wears away, and several girls have sat down near our table, looked at the computers, and laughed. Apparently, they really are looking at me as a wuss for having a laptop so much smaller than the girl beside me. How can this possibly be?
Naturally it’s got me thinking about what might be an adequate equivalent for if the genders were reversed. In other words, what conceivable scenario would lead me, as a heterosexual male, to size up a girl and think, “Due to x quality of her apparent boyfriend, I will not hit on her.” I really can’t imagine anything like that affecting my decision.
My lady friend has counseled me that that’s natural, as that women tend to evaluate men based on interpretations of the symbols found in the context in which they’re situated. I find that sexist—but not entirely inaccurate.
So, in lieu of writing papers, I IM’d some friends, asking what they thought might be an adequate equivalent. One friend said “fashion,” which to me doesn’t really compute: if I saw a girl whose boyfriend was better dressed than her, I might be initially turned off that she’s evidently into guys who are into fashion, but I wouldn’t at all be put off by her own lack of fashion sense. I mean, how could I guy like me possibly afford to be?
Every other friend I asked agreed that there is no equivalent, and such comparative analyses can only happen by females sizing up males in the context of other females (assuming heterosexualiy across the board).
My favorite moment in the brief surveys I administered was the following exchange:
12:46:24 PM Dude: maybe
12:46:38 PM Dude: like the dude has a club foot that she can’t stop footsying under the table
12:46:52 PM Dude: honestly though, fuck gender correlation to computers
12:46:54 PM I: ok. ok, yeah, I’ll put that in my dataset
12:47:00 PM Dude: that 13″ macbook is by far the superior machine
12:47:07 PM I: ok, that’s going in the dataset too
12:47:08 PM I: but
12:47:18 PM I: the fact is, it’s 13″ and clearly I have a small dick
12:47:24 PM I: and my girlfriend dominates me in this relationship
12:47:24 PM Dude: 17″ screen is nice thoughj
12:47:27 PM Dude: though*
12:47:29 PM I: oh man i love you
12:48:03 PM Dude: just grow a beard and feel better
12:51:00 PM I: yeah, I can’t.
12:51:17 PM Dude: …oh.
12:51:54 PM I: yeah, I don’t wanna talk about this anymore
12:52:06 PM Dude: hah
12:52:15 PM Dude: so, how bout them [insert sports team here]
I feel like I learned something today.
You’re currently reading “Technological phallic symbols”, an entry on Im Voraus
- Published:
- 03.16.09 / 11am
- Category:
- musings
- Tags:
- macbooks, penises, procrastination, sociology
- Post Navigation:
- « Friday Random Ten XIII
I heart writing so, so hard »