This was too good not to share.
Oh, NeoOffice, how you disappoint me. Anyone running standard.dic on OpenOffice 2.4 or 3.0 want to test this word and see whether it’s wrong there, too?
If anyone else can confirm, then a bug report is in order. As of right now, Googling for OpenOffice and/or NeoOffice and “unchraismatically” yields no hits, so maybe it’s a custom word I somehow mistakenly added in the four days I’ve been using this computer. (I installed NeoOffice within this period.)
And Googling for it just made things more interesting.
Clicking on the suggested spelling, of course, yields:
The mystery deepens.
I got office 3.0 and all I get is “uncharismatic ally”… sorry babe, i guess you just added that up yourself, especially considering that, even though Wikipedia believes unchraismatically to be a legit word, dictionary.com does not. I find it hard to believe that office would have in their dictionary database a word that dictionary.com doesnt have in theirs AND have it misspelled. Just saying.
Awww… I can actually edit my comments! that is freaking adorable!
Maybe I did. I somehow highly doubt it, though, as I can’t imagine typing that word twice in the same month, let alone same four days.
And regarding the editable comments: I hate the interface, but it’s functional. Glad you like it. <3